Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?
From:	Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:41:20 -0400
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GHFoV30JgJfI0jQKpRoWjAmbPFlmfzVjcrbRk8AO29A=; b=BS0tcsr59E2Nsz3xq9a0V4R+ziSzzVKhIHIIbgsPcGrQzIsHGkD5yra5QAczffQ3yL bqy3YvA0f0MD6HiT8Y6PVXB2aMolFQwp0ny9jAjkZ/IBXZUgGjskmyryVMHEcqhRtGZl lZp9Zxi4BMKmbQGl6ZmTN+JYX377CVEqXRpUg=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w8SC1AaICHuOGO/ckj2kwtjo9GUEHNqjsDPsQGKXcHxewk0VeZztlMkH+X3aK4+34H ttbHOcWQ+vuG41HFQ73wnzsTZuMNVpxYyzy6ZNG/VrvZ0yqOivX0m4aHSSa+Gkt0UFnK EXPrm+DtEfvoz0zCkc6PNpMUvB0bLiLllFcPU=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B66@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Messenger 9.0a1 (Windows/20071115)


Paul Nicholson wrote:

And anyway, there is nobody in North America with a suitable
rx at the moment!

What is the ERP of the 11.9 kHz Alpha transmission? I've recentlygreatly improved my night time reception of the Alpha signals. Yourrecent post stated a 1 db per 1000 km difference between day and nightattenuation at 10 kHz. So I estimate I have a few db to go to detectthe Alpha signal during a daylight path. Which is my objective.Perhaps I'm just dreaming :)


W4DEX

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, (continued) LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Stefan Schäfer LF: Re: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Alan Melia Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Johan H. Bodin Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Horst Stöcker Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Andy Talbot Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Rik Strobbe RE: LF: RE: for W1VLF, Paul A. Cianciolo Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <= Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Alexander S. Yurkov Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Alexander S. Yurkov Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Piotr Młynarski Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Paul Nicholson Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Paul Nicholson AW: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Stefan Schäfer Re: AW: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Paul Nicholson Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Piotr Młynarski Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation, Paul Nicholson LF: Question about ground impedance at 8.97 KHZ Stefan., Paul A. Cianciolo

Previous by Date:	VLF: RX antennas, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	Re: VLF: more RX stns needed, Dave Pick
Previous by Thread:	RE: LF: RE: for W1VLF, Paul A. Cianciolo
Next by Thread:	Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Alexander S. Yurkov
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]