Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: more RX stns needed |
| From: | Dave Pick <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:42:54 +0000 (GMT) |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1269002574; bh=ZmbLw0xAsoa4R2TGZTlXh8DBrj55BWZTeE1DqQYgPP8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=c9MZYRKpLHm5nG2ntGyfu9fAtV+EvOzqDnis5JKstW3c6JlFuqGDtILSqzsV86jOIrgyuUuj+Zw04n/Rx87HqA+qqfjuJwPUF78rFv/QYpDeWaVHTCPDJh0NqLiAMPBoLDLp2GaEA5Wqot8CE3vjwAiDyqLAAvDLCrn23bp8cL8= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SYpEW0YBNIk+GaJV8jJ4dPmFHIgMBACoYSTD71NPCU1ItnE/sNnapG95PynsF46YkMbNe6qP0H5AMdA4Bdm/EfCtZbiLo4Hr1dr9dRc9mEcJpiOnt7pWh0yeJ14Ln/uDb+5WfICPT/nAYo7B0svbKbMrRnvaMdNV8hYOKF6ZJY0=; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B6E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
| References: | <000001cac47a$f4ba1350$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> <E2DAF94B7561449DA86210B16A68F704@JimPC> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B57@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006D51ECA524413B84D8C0019B2FE99C@JimPC> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B6E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Dear Group
I can't promise calibrated results but the receiver seems to be working quite well on my longwire - audible copy on all Alpha stations. I will leave it running over the weekend at wireless.org.uk/grab (grabber 3). At present is on QRSS30 settings, is this OK or should it be slower?
Dave From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, 17 March, 2010 20:52:22 Subject: VLF: more RX stns needed >Really, more receivers are needed - calibrated receivers that can return useful measurements. Yes, really. And who could be one of those? Does one of the italian OMs know more about the website http://www.vlf.it/ ? There should be many interestets and probably well equipped stations. And italy is a good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-) I have seen a RX spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so there seem to be people who are really active in RXing... Sri, i cannot stop dreaming now. 73, Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Alexander S. Yurkov |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: AW: RE: more RX stns needed, Stefan Schäfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Roger Lapthorn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |