Re: VLF: more RX stns needed

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: VLF: more RX stns needed
From:	Dave Pick <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:42:54 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1269002574; bh=ZmbLw0xAsoa4R2TGZTlXh8DBrj55BWZTeE1DqQYgPP8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=c9MZYRKpLHm5nG2ntGyfu9fAtV+EvOzqDnis5JKstW3c6JlFuqGDtILSqzsV86jOIrgyuUuj+Zw04n/Rx87HqA+qqfjuJwPUF78rFv/QYpDeWaVHTCPDJh0NqLiAMPBoLDLp2GaEA5Wqot8CE3vjwAiDyqLAAvDLCrn23bp8cL8=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SYpEW0YBNIk+GaJV8jJ4dPmFHIgMBACoYSTD71NPCU1ItnE/sNnapG95PynsF46YkMbNe6qP0H5AMdA4Bdm/EfCtZbiLo4Hr1dr9dRc9mEcJpiOnt7pWh0yeJ14Ln/uDb+5WfICPT/nAYo7B0svbKbMrRnvaMdNV8hYOKF6ZJY0=;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B6E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
References:	<000001cac47a$f4ba1350$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> <E2DAF94B7561449DA86210B16A68F704@JimPC> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B57@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <006D51ECA524413B84D8C0019B2FE99C@JimPC> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B6E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Dear Group

I can't promise calibrated results but the receiver seems to be working quite well on my longwire - audible copy on all Alpha stations. I will leave it running over the weekend at wireless.org.uk/grab (grabber 3). At present is on QRSS30 settings, is this OK or should it be slower?

Dave

From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 March, 2010 20:52:22
Subject: VLF: more RX stns needed

>Really, more receivers are needed - calibrated receivers that
can return useful measurements.

Yes, really. And who could be one of those?

Does one of the italian OMs know more about the website http://www.vlf.it/ ?
There should be many interestets and probably well equipped stations. And italy is a good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-)
I have seen a RX spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so there seem to be people who are really active in RXing...

Sri, i cannot stop dreaming now.

73, Stefan

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., (continued) Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., James Moritz Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Paul Nicholson VLF: more RX stns needed, Stefan Schäfer Message not available Re: VLF: more RX stns needed, Marco IK1ODO AW: VLF: more RX stns needed, Stefan Schäfer Re: VLF: more RX stns needed, Michael Oexner Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Message not available Re: LF: RE: Question about ground impedance at 8.97 KHZ Stefan., Stefan Schäfer Re: VLF: more RX stns needed, Horst Stöcker LF: RE: more RX stns needed, victor13 LF: AW: RE: more RX stns needed, Stefan Schäfer Re: VLF: more RX stns needed, Dave Pick <= Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Roger Lapthorn LF: DK7FC identification, Markus Vester LF: Re: Re: DREAM 9 ANTENNA, mal hamilton LF: RE: DREAM 9 ANTENNA, Rik Strobbe

Previous by Date:	Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX
Next by Date:	Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Alexander S. Yurkov
Previous by Thread:	LF: AW: RE: more RX stns needed, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test..., Roger Lapthorn
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]