Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test...

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test...
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:10:07 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1268777410; bh=HWLdIk51NTFvw+oPSMI+cuGRt0sTT7vo+OKQ5mUv3W4=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=oFPGawl7m3Hj10I6r9IbZtUhgQhBdWbtSw43vwu9pyEoRjAA8vOiHpSw5mWJR/qFv6VJAul4DE+TLQ06RwZkwY/WNrCmTfBFGbhRXwpWK572tqc89OIoVAPzLg694NIc0qw3PokcJguUpcBk40/l/ibm35eyDRnV8zviwR5nuo4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=xNCnGuFSQ5+JnVZE2wia3Jz4Qni1bZ7hrKPoqLkn9qpvvExK5ze5CaB64yk9coXtlUXErYIAJhmJSeMVCo2FwfmFfEMPRJLvdlhETzrPgq78riepgS/kPW93AEHPKjmEgPtpFE7JXOdIJPghIgFQoordnblpqQlsV5e/6Ou6Uc0= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <000001cac47a$f4ba1350$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> <E2DAF94B7561449DA86210B16A68F704@JimPC> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B57@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear Stefan, Paul, LF Group,

I would agree that something like DFCW100 or DFCW200 with about 0.1Hz shift would be a good candidate mode for further DX tests. DFCW is about 2 -3 times quicker than QRSS, also because there are two frequencies, there is a better chance of seeing at least one frequency if narrow band interference is present on the other. I have just tried setting Spectrum Lab to directly generate 8970Hz DFCW200 audio output from the sound card and it seems to work OK, so generating the signal should be simple, although for /P use, you may need a bigger external battery to power a laptop for long enough to actually transmit your callsign!

I am not too suprised I did not see DK7FC's signal yesterday - I had left my receiver set up for QRSS30 reception, not knowing what transmission mode would be in use. So several dB SNR would have been lost by not using the correct FFT parameters. Also, Paul's 5mHz FFT resolution was longer than optimum for QRSS120 reception.

I left the spectrogram running overnight and through today - see the attachment for about 14 hours duration this morning/afternoon between 8900 - 9100 Hz. Sorry about the image quality, but it gives the general idea. Ignoring the narrow-band QRM, the background noise is several dB lower during the early part of the day, and several dB higher at night, than during yesterday's tests. So the morning would be a good time for tests, it seems. The jagged lines are the 179th and 181st harmonics of the mains frequency - sometimes these also drift onto 8970Hz. The pattern of more stable lines also sometimes causes QRM on 8970Hz. I don't know what these are - the pattern of lines suggests they are harmonics of a fundamental "carrier" of about 31.5Hz, with "modulation" around 5 - 6 Hz. They are present continuously during most of the day, but overnight appear with 50% duty cycle, switching on and off once every hour. Any ideas?

So at my end there is potentially substantial improvements in reception to be obtained by using the correct FFT parameters, and also by using a /P location with lower noise levels. I will certainly be interested to take part in the next test.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

Attachment: 9kHz_background.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>