OK Marco, thank you!
And do you think that this grabber is well optimised? A professional equipment,
such as Paul's?
I do not run a own VLF RX, just the TX... ...in the moment. So i don't have
really experiance which effort is needed at the RX side.
Maybe, a simple wire and some filtering will be not enough! Having a low noise
garden for placing the antenna could probably be the half job.
But the website looks impressing and so i assume the RXers there know what to
do.
Would that be a challenge? And what would be the distance to the next
interested and well equipped station?
Maybe we can get a mail-contact to the RX stn operators?
73 :-)
Stefan/DK7FC
________________________________
Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Marco IK1ODO
Gesendet: Mi 17.03.2010 22:12
An: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: VLF: more RX stns needed
At 21.55 17/03/2010, you wrote:
> >Really, more receivers are needed - calibrated receivers that
>can return useful measurements.
>
>Yes, really. And who could be one of those?
>
>Does one of the italian OMs know more about the website http://www.vlf.it/ ?
>There should be many interestets and probably well equipped
>stations. And italy is a good distance. The alps may be no problem ;-)
>I have seen a RX spectrogram of the 82Hz ELF transmitter there, so
>there seem to be people who are really active in RXing...
>
>Sri, i cannot stop dreaming now.
>
>73, Stefan
Hi Stefan,
here we are :-) - Renato IK1QFK owns www.vlf.it and I meet him every
working day from 8:45 to 17:45, HI.
He is aware of your tests, and already has a grabber running. No
problem to add an high detail 9 kHz zoom, I presume.
Renato reads in copy, and you may write to him at [email protected]
73 - Marco IK1ODO
<<winmail.dat>>
|
