To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO? |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:52:33 +0200 |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Thread-index: | AcrPMu6GU7Uq2DCEQ+CVygxRWFi6+QAEl5tW |
Thread-topic: | Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO? |
Dear Group, Recently i talked to Markus/DF6NM what has at least to be transmitted within a valid QSO in very slow DFCW. I mean a 2way contact, not a beacon reception report! Those of you (and others) who have done successful TA QSOs may give me an example. Are there official rules/laws about that? If i would do a QSO with Markus like that, would it be valid?: Me: "dk7fc/p k" (the /p may be cancelled but it is "my label" ;-) ) Markus: "fc df6nm O k" Me: "nm fc r M sk" Markus: "r sk" 73, Stefan/DK7FC <<winmail.dat>> |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: LF T/A [137kHz] What is it ?, Warren Ziegler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: RE: 503.750khz, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: for W1VLF, Alexander S. Yurkov |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |