Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?

[Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>]

Hi Johan,

You are right but first i think (and hope) there will come up other TX 
stations. Otherwise it would make no sense to discuss whats necessary 
for a 2 way QSO ;-)
And 137kHz also started with the first transmitting station, HI ;-)

One day, we can look back to our first VLF mails (that interested not 
only a few but many stns), starting in Februar 2010 with a smile and see 
what we have reached since that time, just like on LF :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC


> Yes, of course. It important to remember that 9kHz is still "the lonely
> dreamer's band". Pile-ups and other "traffic jams" are still quite rare
> (!) so the risk of misreading a callsign is minimal. There are about
> three million licenced radio amateurs on the regulated ham bands. On
> 9kHz there is currently one (Stefan), and he has the privilege to choose
> his own callsign, operating procedures etc. without breaking any law.
>
> 73
> Johan SM6LKM
>
>