LF: for W1VLF

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: for W1VLF
From:	"Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:03:44 +0000 (GMT)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]


Dear Paul,
i tried send answer to your mail but it is unsecessfuly. Mail rejected i
din't know why. Someone wrong with your mail box? Just now i leave my
home and i'll be offline for a week or so. I'll answer you again when
be back. CUL

Regards,
Alexander/RA9MB

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, (continued) Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Jacek Lipkowski Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?, Paul Nicholson VLF: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission, Stefan Schäfer Re: VLF: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission, Michael Oexner AW: VLF: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission, Stefan Schäfer LF: Cooperative ionosphere effects, Alexander S. Yurkov Re: LF: Cooperative ionosphere effects, Paul Nicholson Re: LF: Cooperative ionosphere effects, Alexander S. Yurkov Re: LF: Cooperative ionosphere effects, Alexander S. Yurkov Re: LF: Cooperative ionosphere effects, Alexander S. Yurkov LF: for W1VLF, Alexander S. Yurkov <= LF: for W1VLF, Alexander S. Yurkov LF: RE: for W1VLF, Paul A. Cianciolo LF: RE: for W1VLF, Paul A. Cianciolo Re: LF: RE: for W1VLF, Alexander S. Yurkov LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Stefan Schäfer LF: Re: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Alan Melia Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Mike Dennison Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Johan H. Bodin Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Horst Stöcker Re: LF: Minimum content of a valid QRSS/DFCW QSO?, Stefan Schäfer

Previous by Date:	RE: LF: 500kHz: OK0EMW, DI2AM, Horst Stöcker
Next by Date:	Re: AW: VLF: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission, Wolfgang Büscher
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Cooperative ionosphere effects, Alexander S. Yurkov
Next by Thread:	LF: for W1VLF, Alexander S. Yurkov
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]