Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?
From: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:12:50 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B66@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Paul Nicholson wrote:

For me, the power levels for this long DX are getting worryingly
high as they will at some point start to cause interference to
research activity. [...]

a few years ago i asked people doing geophysical research if they would be able to receive amateur transmissions at 8.9kHz. they said that the usual research is upto a few kilohertz, and that 8.9kHz is just a little over the range that they usually use for research (i think that they recorded upto 7-8kHz). if the transmitter isn't soft-keyed, then key clicks might be a problem (but would be filtered by the high Q antenna matching network)

i don't know about lightning detection networks, they might be vulnerable, but Stefan's ERP is a bit small compared to a lightning bolt :)

also the geophysical/atmospheric research people have a lot of experience in avoiding 50/60/16.6Hz harmonics, powerline communications (the HV type uses kHz frequencies, lots of power and _large_ antennas).

so it might be not so much of a big problem after all.

VY 73

Jacek / SQ5BPF




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>