Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: AW: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AW: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA?
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:40:05 +0000
In-reply-to: <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B76@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B66@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B76@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421)


Stefan schrieb:
> Will not be easy but we could start just with a
> simple carrier

Pure carrier doesn't have to be continuous, eg separate 10min
transmissions.  Non-coherent averaging can use disjoint
periods so long as you note the UT start/finish of each.

> next time i think it is a good idea to transmit a "K"
> in DFCW-600.

Yes, no need to waste time with inter-symbol gaps.  I think
with that you will establish some firm records.  A message
to Henny is a good prospect.

I found global average lightning data on the web, 2.5 deg
gridded data - perfect!

ftp://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/pub/data/lis/climatology/LRDC/lolrdc_dataset.html

It is tempting to try to reproduce the diurnal noise pattern
from this.  Could be a neat way to test simple propagation
formula at long range.
--
Paul Nicholson
--



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>