Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:12:24 +0100
References: <32098189.1842344.1266827344324.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb080> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B04@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Acqz3B2XQhA+qwXMQhis8g8ptGhQPwAKsdaF
Thread-topic: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz
Jacek and group, 
 
That are really interesting responses here. That's what i like in this group!
 
Well, perhaps it is not necessary to reach a "DX", DX becomes very relative in 
that frequency range. 50km sounds like a really good DX here. 
 
But what about that WSPR mode, everyone was using before some weeks? Wouldn't 
that be a nice tool to try what's possible, for a first step?
 
If 750m is possible with 2W TX power and 4m*14m loop then it should be possible 
to reach some km with a grounded dipole of abt 2x500m. And if the ends are 
grounded, the impedance will decrease. Bandwidth will increase due to the 
resistive end loading and the voltage over the coils will decrease. That will 
depend by the end capacity and conductivity, of course. Something like a 
vertical loop with the second half as the earth. Maybe, if the formula RA9MB 
showed is correct, it would be better not to place it on the ground but hung it 
up on some trees. Sure, everything in the near will be lossy but that's the 
case at each commercial VLF transmitter as well. The losses are simply a part 
of the job. 
 
Important is the achieved fascination, isn't it? What would you feel if you 
would get a contact in QRSS10 to your next VLF interested neighbour, say in 
20km? I expect the biggest problem on VLF is to find a person who is fascinated 
in the same manner than one self ;-) I do not know someone in a radius of 50km 
who is interested :-( But i will discuss it in our club...
 
BTW, why exactly choosing 8,79 kHz (Horst?)?, why not 8,9 kHz?
 
We all have a great hobby, really!
 
73, Stefan/DK7FC
 

________________________________

Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Jacek Lipkowski
Gesendet: Mo 22.02.2010 17:25
An: [email protected]
Betreff: LF: Re: Beaconing on 8.79 kHz in QRSS



I've done some tests on VLF also, like many others on this group.

For antennas i've used a 1.5m x 2.5m 3-turn loop, a 4mx14m 1-turn loop,
and coupling to external structures (i won't disscuss this bit here :).

Using the third antenna i can receive my vlf beacon abt 750m from here.
The power was abt. 2W from a TDA2030:
http://acid.ch.pw.edu.pl/~sq5bpf/ham/vlf/20100203/vlfcapt3747.jpg

The receiving antenna was a 100turn loop in a hula-hop toy with a dia. of
90cm. This loop was tuned to resonance and amplified.

Using the 4x14m loop and abt. 40w from a TDA1562 i can receive it from
930m:

http://acid.ch.pw.edu.pl/~sq5bpf/ham/vlf/capt0706082213.jpg

The receiving antenna was a 50turn loop in a hula-hop toy with a dia. of
80cm. This loop was connected to the amplifier virtual ground (broadband
design like "easyloop").

If i remember correctly i could receive 40W into the 1.5x2.5m 3-turn loop
at about 500m.

Unfortunately i haven't had an opportunity to play with e-field antennas,
which should be much more efficient. I've noted that for b-field antennas
nearby installations (power lines, phone lines etc) can carry the vlf
signal far away (hint :)

VY 73

Jacek / SQ5BPF




<<winmail.dat>>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>