To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz |
From: | "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:30:55 +0000 (GMT) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
> > Nice comment from Alex on near-field....long time since we heard from > you last Alex or maybe I dont read the group enough. Unfortunely i have very few time for ham radio. But i read this group regulary. Usualy i don't write here now. But about VLF i wonder to point out that for near field antenna voltage is more worth then power. Current is too small... Also it is funny that in such a condition signal don't depend on frequency at all! See the formula. But certanly the lower freq the more noise from power lines (50 Hz) in RX point. All of this is obviously in framework of electrostatics. But it is absolutely unusual for radio. Hi. Seems it is a good task for a student to analyse such a problem. Practicaly it is good idea to use high voltage ferrite transformer from old TV set to get high voltage on TX antenna. Make few turns additionaly as primary wireing is not a problem, big secondary wireing is ready in such a transformer. Few km seems to be real. But it is too dificult radiate vlf for large distance in ham conditions. One need real radiation (not 'electrostatic' field) for this. Regards, Alexander/RA9MB |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DATA, Piotr Młynarski |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: RE: DATA, M0FMT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF_8.79 kHz, ALAN MELIA |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: AW: Beaconing on 8.79 kHz in QRSS, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |