Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise

[N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>]

Hi Domenico,

Thanks for this interesting report !

If you later find decodes of my JT9-10, please let me know. In that
case I will update the experiment report to include your results.

73,
Paul N1BUG


On 1/16/19 7:35 PM, Domenico IZ7SLZ wrote:
>  LF,
> ..another late report from me.
> 
> On 14 and 15 i ran my usual receiver setup on LF and using vlfrx-tools and
> 'sox' program i have prepared a bash file for attempt the decode of jt9-2,
> jt9-5 transmissions.
> 
> My routine is under development yet but i get already some results. See
> below .
> 
> I have decoded N1BUG on jt9-5 and 2E0ILY on jt9-2.
> 
> The audio frequency shown is wrong becouse it is not yet corrected by the
> speed-up factor.
> 
> As soon as possible i have to prepare a routine also for jt9-10 and check
> if some decodes of N1BUG are possible using the recordered audio of jan 15.
> 
> 
> 0022  17  -16  -0.5   3439.   0   CQ 2E0ILY IO82         JT9
> 0018  12  -17  -0.3   3439.   0   CQ 2E0ILY IO82         JT9
> ============== 2019-01-14 ===============
> 
> 
> 
> 0210   2  -25  -1.0   2341.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
> 0130   1  -27  -1.0   2340.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
> 0030   2  -26  -1.0   2340.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
> 0010   2  -26  -1.0   2341.   1   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
> ============== 2019-01-15 ===============
> 
> 
> 
> 73, Domenico IZ7SLZ