Hello Paul,
I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning.
In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km).
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________________
Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens
N1BUG <[email protected]>
Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 15:14
Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; Discussion of the
Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; [email protected]
Onderwerp: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
transmit on 2200m.
I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
plus 395 Hz audio).
All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
provide the best comparison between the modes.
If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
for at least two nights, maybe three.
73,
Paul N1BUG
______________________________________________________________
600MRG mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
Message delivered to [email protected]
This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
|
