Hello Paul, all,
JT9-5: my mistake!
I was running SlowJT9 v0.9.12.5 for JT9-5 and that version will not decode
below 400Hz.
I should have known better ...
I will install a second version of v0.9.14.0 (using the ZIP file) and
runmonitor both JT9-5 and JT9-10 with v0.9.14.0.
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________________
Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens N1BUG
<[email protected]>
Verzonden: zondag 13 januari 2019 12:52
Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; Discussion of the
Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Hello Rik,
Thanks for this report. It is interesting you did not decode me on
JT9-5 since some of the JT9-10 reports indicate the signal was
strong enough. Perhaps just the timing of QSB. I did receive JT9-5
reports from other stations so I believe my transmissions were OK.
The test will continue for two more nights if there are no equipment
malfunctions.
73,
Paul N1BUG
On 1/13/19 3:42 AM, Rik Strobbe wrote:
> Hello Paul, Alex,
>
> below my overnight JT9-10 copies .
> Not a single copy in JT9-5.
> The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight.
>
> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
>
> 2240 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 2250 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 2300 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0010 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0020 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0040 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0100 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0110 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0120 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0130 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0140 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0140 -34 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0150 -34 -0.4 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0200 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0200 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0210 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0220 -29 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0220 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0230 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0240 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0240 -37 -0.7 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0300 -31 -0.6 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0300 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0310 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0320 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0320 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0330 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0340 -36 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0350 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
> 0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0640 -31 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0700 -32 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0720 -30 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0740 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
> 0800 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
>
> ________________________________________
> Van: Rik Strobbe
> Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 22:00
> Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; Discussion of the
> Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
>
> Hello Paul,
>
> I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning.
> In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km).
>
> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8481): https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/message/8481
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29062197/1555778
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/leave/3440736/168031436/xyzzy
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|
