To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise |
From: | Domenico IZ7SLZ <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:35:52 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/plZvWHCL+trRM+YbcvoYtwUKOKBPoaXZUTY0W4wgn8=; b=F0NUqiXPvTKF3opHK05fTIY8xV8S8VBqSGhgHzhYOuoB0bxTLXo+Lm+N6nhNactaqy EoZnxQZNp1AvI4F2b74o8pE9swe1MjymAze8hCGNV0nlUEdqyNxD0IH9lV0SsHLQ5bOF zGB6tg3paO37mQiiUDyt83How8fgKtR7ZbrMjzM82rDuq+wz38VdHEIasiJ4MyISN48W RnWOQQ/prRY4Lh974G4V3aCIQUkXJpTVjlsRidWw8FOSvDoroEdG3skuEsaCGL/qTLu0 VwkxeUx3FMrJDIre1lidARk5GktUuqbetYg7jH1NoHkFOrcI/nJLca6C+MIG4L3Q0iDQ 2s3g== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
LF, ..another late report from me. On 14 and 15 i ran my usual
receiver setup on LF and using vlfrx-tools and 'sox' program i have
prepared a bash file for attempt the decode of jt9-2, jt9-5 transmissions. My routine is under development yet but i get already some results. See below . I have decoded N1BUG on jt9-5 and 2E0ILY on jt9-2. The audio frequency shown is wrong becouse it is not yet corrected by the speed-up factor. As
soon as possible i have to prepare a routine also for jt9-10 and check
if some decodes of N1BUG are possible using the recordered audio of jan 15. 0022 17 -16 -0.5 3439. 0 CQ 2E0ILY IO82 JT9 0018 12 -17 -0.3 3439. 0 CQ 2E0ILY IO82 JT9 ============== 2019-01-14 =============== 0210 2 -25 -1.0 2341. 0 VVV N1BUG 5 JT9 0130 1 -27 -1.0 2340. 0 VVV N1BUG 5 JT9 0030 2 -26 -1.0 2340. 0 VVV N1BUG 5 JT9 0010 2 -26 -1.0 2341. 1 VVV N1BUG 5 JT9 ============== 2019-01-15 =============== 73, Domenico IZ7SLZ On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 10:23, Geoff G0LUJ <[email protected]> wrote: Extra reports, post sunrise. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tonite, Domenico IZ7SLZ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tonite, jrusgrove |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Geoff G0LUJ |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Chris Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |