Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

To: Michel F5WK <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 13:21:03 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHUq+/veYFmhr6ankqffxbGHEJVHKWuqA6AgAAX4rI=
Thread-topic: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
And be sure to use version 0.9.14, older versions will not decode below 400Hz.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

________________________________________
Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens N1BUG 
<[email protected]>
Verzonden: maandag 14 januari 2019 13:54
Aan: Michel F5WK; [email protected]; [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [rsgb-lf-group] LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

Hi Michel,

Are you sure about settings for JT9-5?

There is the period 0620 - 0720z which looks as if JT9-5 should have
been OK.

Thanks for the report!

73,
Paul N1BUG


On 1/14/19 4:59 AM, Michel Brunel wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> No JT9-5  spots received  yet,
>
> 19-01-13 23:20 2220 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 00:00 2300 -35 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 02:00 0100 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 02:20 0120 -33 -0.9  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 02:40 0140 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 03:00 0200 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 03:20 0220 -36 -0.7  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 03:40 0240 -35 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 04:00 0300 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 04:20 0320 -32 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 04:40 0340 -34 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 05:00 0400 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 05:20 0420 -35 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 05:40 0440 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 06:00 0500 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 06:20 0520 -34 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 07:00 0600 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 07:20 0620 -32 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 07:40 0640 -29 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 08:00 0700 -29 -0.7  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 08:20 0720 -28 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 08:40 0740 -35 -0.9  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
> 19-01-14 09:00 0800 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
>
>
> Michel - f5wk JN18HP
>
>
>
> Le samedi 12 janvier 2019 à 15:14:12, N1BUG écrivait :
>
>> Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
>> transmit on 2200m.
>
>> I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
>> plus 395 Hz audio).
>
>> All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
>> distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
>> provide the best comparison between the modes.
>
>> If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
>> for at least two nights, maybe three.
>
>> 73,
>> Paul N1BUG

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#8499): https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/message/8499
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/29077750/1555778
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/rsgb-lf-group/leave/3440736/168031436/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>