Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

To: Michel F5WK <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
From: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 07:54:55 -0500
Autocrypt: addr=[email protected]; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFqj1+0BEACggWlaH8oG/AiXSUG3CeQwZ1NrVEP4U7YsA9N9XEffjCDEsnTjHF2BJSgS 2AicyomkmTGvghEHxrNFfFw07jwgJl97ae/VtNxpERPSE98mb4sPOMpJbwddioMazMDXwhKA wpg5fse+Ru8OrIT04KK919xL/pZuAP6pY6d2kVoizjJOfS71pHpiU6N6q3d9cl+w7d2LKhAE a3A1ZgDquPvn0WQlrN8K5D66xVrwTRhf1b5H4Ozl8/mMJzCeLG1ZIsDB3Pu2flwE81P8dCJA y1azwgY8pTEshVk4em/se9uRiZaDJr/qUSCf6hrV7AGa8g1jpAQDmdGpDNYMqyDqXen4jNi1 8kNFVu1BMl2vjaI8skw/YPxIxlk/0ROHYhN6SuoDq1mt4AW4FryNa7k3A8dM8Bt7udBoTv0i uw4j9R/bmh2vl/QaHRUhDco0xn2z6geWvXkKqha++vzXDrEKUuqgB85SDZPs5W/phs9p0pz1 xA61d1gn8FQJtpou5dQuAucqMo8eKQY5LUcbC+MH5pebH+M2wIuDCBmFPJHQDSPNepeaxJ4o G/HU1hrpzlgLiTTSKR8DcwtMQwYywnCTlm8MgL4jXuPzoGyKDMYyKIjC51G+3AAOJ6oXJAGR g0ehhCPtmnCGBaRlUIoUSpbgc4B+onqFKZmDiVm9CRNJhKIWrQARAQABtBZOMUJVRyA8cGF1 bEBuMWJ1Zy5jb20+iQI9BBMBCAAnBQJao9ftAhsjBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUICQoLAgQWAgMB Ah4BAheAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjPBsQAIh+Haz9gqrQJ0OlMI5xmQ0A5nsVWcatWF/Ea4mucNjL 4n4jmW+Z4Ukn3OVss55chWwrOVMRNWU2d2zRc92ZF7yJhLCoJFV870bZfxNYwdJ3GEBLIu6/ anmQYX0oXFx8UBsx5K6egNqbeflPA7zrLiQkWrz6JApECdiA1rHDjyJdS7PDxBCG9cKgr/5b r4Rn/JlUl9pRPnxlSwHXsV+J6JtFYtWI69MWIVD7Y7OY1wO9+684uOnzeDANzeIwpBDcSm6p 0D5u0b1hfPl2TD0ozVs6P0NvxkMbimXUhRR1QD0FvydyxmZTLAo+XZDGR8GqWYrYrauoRZ1h 3m23+bNT2T4AuoFnWekpsZu+sxIf0LKPtEZCa51O65jZ810ROpXg9Lx71gEoQD+kbjO69+kq 9r7wjytDq/jyhpOGrGYV6kgcQrISY86t9YvkA9Of2HDzZLih3GwecW6fkeV1AO5w4RteE9nL zIs2siGw2YqavF6LpTH71Db7cUYyZWn5hkKpwfpLNnPEuqgZACovpH1WUHx+KMqqIL4rMVCH GcSLqnH2KF4cEDb6OeTbwuLfpGlN+I3j24eQnB2uz5rDa7/IBjsClLl8S/wdDTP8IikBGixX 06v3k06tk/OF4UsfJ0cY/ASGP5+kjT4ASMZAIikwVMpKi5A5be77vecKNYlJQ2a6uQINBFqj 1+0BEACaujZXo3F17v7QTnub4DjjYvm+nr8J0uU5pPc1UMEz9eWjmtmITm15fx1hPKNtVW+I VlT+DG+ShNnYmO2M4CFBoc7PwkAOc70aDxfHz20kotvj1HhXG7oBiqPkN3TK4C7qWV1HUEPA V960qPdhsoCqmtkvNwj39w1T0ZR5qwwaqDogs9UwBib7zseQ3OXHG32xYYCMcxM35hgXGkkz R7wFL4ZnAPOeFb8LnWtZcrGpwXdsYkXuCxm+A+u9KlFY+w3ZCzZt1F9Ie+/PSZnFIUtbXt2i mfc+VkRwOLz5BDAeWuDL09TN81+gbrR3kXlymDcCbuduO/yHOQK085qzE3LuImdy+JNb7oDf 1C/hvpRvtB02vVy33rzIXT8644SJzFY/mw/W39/BgHKCoL1FrBbfgf0UoIFw5M752i7jQwmv j5yFfnVAXIPpCuusMwWMGVpZcGV7QxJxh0HBEhYgOo9v3zKwzNIPm9V/LA67u/rj4a/MlCE0 mpd6IHaePE1vXDaboPZHZdhAziru5/Jd7KQI0k+HmM/HRANPRNDZ4UeBpgj9PzS6hDN5GHlZ fRUbI8JAg9wSaQtEn0bjyaR7lw0yngZTvvjT1Qqt5zGwm1IAall2STes5xK0aS7p+UJJMVbf ydZ5VOnocvUkwYxbiqoyuVtGxi4tpWW9CRstYXMkAwARAQABiQIlBBgBCAAPBQJao9ftAhsM BQkJZgGAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjTDMP/18q7uhac/naxoFsOqhgXIlvaPgu6GX7s/QOh+bcSV1F y50lxo51P/C95H2TVME/CtCjk2xWQcNjWtXloMEsZpl7T3qWgJHvyZYkDtgh3M6UNY+zb08U K9E2+rR0AZ6zdMKio7Z1xA9BtbUpSZpvy2NgjoYVqo35NllUWMZJq0u+88PvE5WeCIqLipNI EZmUcG9UwolQbPkrRc42ReL+bFbuXGXDA5GbQ0RudXbugI8iUwaw3ftaKElIZtuHW0hw1VrU 9tVHsxKyEoKgNNT1hr+dgRmvCHmA87Pi4R5cMV0ZkLVOYfPX1motedag7HmSNPi2PkYLts4z kyvPEJe2IvaPvjvK1ShRWWgje3uytrhfwyjUZcIuA76RWEfBbwT2Mbrn9O7LvrYtbTiTlsLo Zdk2uocuefBvPd2oI7mTn5eLy/VDy2JVnlb9vpZZhriXI4KtCcP6mYyuPxlxqj/30Kn1fU5b C4EpnKy6hW1CHM42DbwzT+ChjBpFbX9bfwT4qn6d42+T4mN5wkmfnBRHfcn8Wf1ezRSK3Ome Esa3ZDssj23CZHe11uec6Ln14qoB7JyRT9qM3Q99tzvAlmWFM3GrSsG94g4JponQjQWHmr8B eMYezwJHzSI7zWElJpzs/OuohstTYfYTy16FygUOEinc1K4ywjEklgRpXRtjKvqc
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
Hi Michel,

Are you sure about settings for JT9-5?

There is the period 0620 - 0720z which looks as if JT9-5 should have
been OK.

Thanks for the report!

73,
Paul N1BUG


On 1/14/19 4:59 AM, Michel Brunel wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> No JT9-5  spots received  yet,
> 
> 19-01-13 23:20 2220 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 00:00 2300 -35 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 02:00 0100 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 02:20 0120 -33 -0.9  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 02:40 0140 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 03:00 0200 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 03:20 0220 -36 -0.7  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 03:40 0240 -35 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 04:00 0300 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 04:20 0320 -32 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 04:40 0340 -34 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 05:00 0400 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 05:20 0420 -35 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 05:40 0440 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 06:00 0500 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 06:20 0520 -34 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 07:00 0600 -37 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 07:20 0620 -32 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 07:40 0640 -29 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 08:00 0700 -29 -0.7  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 08:20 0720 -28 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 08:40 0740 -35 -0.9  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 19-01-14 09:00 0800 -36 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X           
> 
> 
> Michel - f5wk JN18HP
> 
> 
> 
> Le samedi 12 janvier 2019 à 15:14:12, N1BUG écrivait :
> 
>> Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
>> transmit on 2200m.
> 
>> I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
>> plus 395 Hz audio).
> 
>> All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
>> distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
>> provide the best comparison between the modes.
> 
>> If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
>> for at least two nights, maybe three.
> 
>> 73,
>> Paul N1BUG

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>