Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

To: "RSGB LF group"<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
From: "dhchurch"<[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:48:34 +0000
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hello Paul
Conditions improved towards dawn. I only ran JT9-10 as I run WSPR2, WSPR15 & Opera together as well and don't normally know what the latest trend is. Considering there is a 200ft limestone cliff behind us in your direction it seems quite good.
73, Hugh, M0DSZ
----- Receiving the following content -----
From: N1BUG
Time: 2019-01-12, 14:14:12
Subject: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test

Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
transmit on 2200m.

I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
plus 395 Hz audio).

All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
provide the best comparison between the modes.

If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
for at least two nights, maybe three.

Paul N1BUG

Attachment: N1BUG.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>