Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise

[Chris Wilson <dead.fets@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the info, appreciated

Best Regards
Chris Wilson

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019, 00:40 Domenico IZ7SLZ <iz7slz.domenico@gmail.com wrote:

LF,

..another late report from me.

On 14 and 15 i ran my usual receiver setup on LF and using vlfrx-tools and 'sox' program i have prepared a bash file for attempt the decode of jt9-2, jt9-5 transmissions.

My routine is under development yet but i get already some results. See below .

I have decoded N1BUG on jt9-5 and 2E0ILY on jt9-2.

The audio frequency shown is wrong becouse it is not yet corrected by the speed-up factor.

As soon as possible i have to prepare a routine also for jt9-10 and check if some decodes of N1BUG are possible using the recordered audio of jan 15.

0022  17  -16  -0.5   3439.   0   CQ 2E0ILY IO82         JT9
0018  12  -17  -0.3   3439.   0   CQ 2E0ILY IO82         JT9
============== 2019-01-14 ===============

0210   2  -25  -1.0   2341.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
0130   1  -27  -1.0   2340.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
0030   2  -26  -1.0   2340.   0   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
0010   2  -26  -1.0   2341.   1   VVV N1BUG 5            JT9
============== 2019-01-15 ===============

73, Domenico IZ7SLZ

On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 10:23, Geoff G0LUJ <lf@g0luj.com> wrote:

Extra reports, post sunrise.

The unchecking of the 'Discard audio frequency limits on RX' box has
enabled JT9-10 decodes to resume.

19-01-15 08:16 0816 -29 -0.6  396 2  VVV N1BUG 2

19-01-15 07:50 0750 -32 -0.8  395 5  VVV N1BUG 5
19-01-15 08:10 0810 -30 -0.8  395 5  VVV N1BUG 5
19-01-15 08:30 0830 -30 -0.7  395 5  VVV N1BUG 5

19-01-15 08:00 0800 -33 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
19-01-15 08:20 0820 -30 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X
19-01-15 08:40 0840 -34 -0.8  395 X  VVV N1BUG X