Hello Paul,
far less than the previous night:
0550 -34 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5
0100 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0120 -37 -0.9 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0540 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________________
Van: Rik Strobbe
Verzonden: zondag 13 januari 2019 9:42
Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; Discussion of the
Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; [email protected];
[email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Hello Paul, Alex,
below my overnight JT9-10 copies .
Not a single copy in JT9-5.
The last copy of Paul (so far) was at 08.00 UTC, in broad daylight.
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
2240 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
2250 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
2300 -36 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0010 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0020 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0040 -35 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0100 -37 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0100 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0110 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0120 -37 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0130 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0140 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0140 -34 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0150 -34 -0.4 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0200 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0200 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0210 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0220 -29 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0220 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0230 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0240 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0240 -37 -0.7 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0300 -31 -0.6 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0300 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0310 -33 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0320 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0320 -34 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0330 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0340 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0340 -36 -0.5 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0350 -35 -0.6 405 X R7NT KN97LF
0400 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0620 -36 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0640 -31 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0700 -32 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0720 -30 -1.0 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0740 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
0800 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X
________________________________________
Van: Rik Strobbe
Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 22:00
Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; Discussion of the
Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; [email protected];
[email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Hello Paul,
I will monitor both modes overnight on 136kHz dial and report in the morning.
In JT9-10 I had 5 copies of R7NT so far (QRB 2505km).
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________________
Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens
N1BUG <[email protected]>
Verzonden: zaterdag 12 januari 2019 15:14
Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; Discussion of the
Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands; [email protected]
Onderwerp: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test
Local weather and snow/ice conditions have improved enough to
transmit on 2200m.
I am running a JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test on 136.395 kHz (136.000 'dial'
plus 395 Hz audio).
All reception reports will be useful and appreciated. Reports from
distant stations who can monitor both modes during the test will
provide the best comparison between the modes.
If there are no problems with equipment I plan to let this test run
for at least two nights, maybe three.
73,
Paul N1BUG
______________________________________________________________
600MRG mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/600mrg
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
Message delivered to [email protected]
This list hosted by: https://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: https://www.qsl.net/donate.html
|
