To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise |
From: | Geoff G0LUJ <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:19:56 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=g0luj.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:References:Reply-To:To:From:Subject:Sender:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dIgN/Fo0943UCPtvHagDdhZqDVpwDHg44pfh2ldt+Xw=; b=Cm1GUG6xZvvebmuXsBGzqScWGB +bUrZFO1paiOqxrhKuT+cJo1mMKekGz0Y1CUMd6GPQM41nH+Gr/HP7lt7ZF/VCPaqS9lqHRSHKQmW FDJkefmTUt1545YhsQ1W7cuxhk3jWOm9IZhzcAa3dS/YER+sXg8YYDSDIrf/QXeAZKqEo/ZiHgGT7 EkjdPw7jvaiBXp6GB7+Kzcdc0VNWrwzwhansW9/xwU/o8grkvjr13ThaBIK1pOYioZvc90RPBj2fL SVbW7OKgq96dnW2lA3XbG8LQTwAHZ5V/D7QYjUjHUL+gkUQHPnfUapifv+AB9e0T75khLsoTau5EL VQZEKiYg==; |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
Extra reports, post sunrise.The unchecking of the 'Discard audio frequency limits on RX' box has enabled JT9-10 decodes to resume. 19-01-15 08:16 0816 -29 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 07:50 0750 -32 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 08:10 0810 -30 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 08:30 0830 -30 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 08:00 0800 -33 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 19-01-15 08:20 0820 -30 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X 19-01-15 08:40 0840 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test, Geoff G0LUJ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 2E0ILY Slow JT9 captures, Chris Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test, Geoff G0LUJ |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Domenico IZ7SLZ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |