Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test |
| From: | Geoff G0LUJ <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:51:39 +0000 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=g0luj.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hompnmWmxYhvusz5OPJKDHYwlqbi1sN2Gf9Hnuzkijo=; b=OrqBpTt+mS1ZdXBNXy5h/sR1Cr zx/Gl0XqNVSra/yYQqJ0Qm2OQPPwfaJMWVK6Lu5LZag3HY0Pl+AzuWnwZpXL+ADJ2k3QAJFAm3Ank BW5ZzIno5DQRfS/LDHTHEpczkcHXz2jCifSEWG9fP2J3tjl34ECxA+6NtLZJ2Eb8ejJcK5NPEIbEt a3kUK7cUnvzJRZR8YZ2GSpiXwigO0vGDmNS/56FEPVFL6EnksMPwoZaoDEprMVt05xcXc2GA+OUQR LTUzpir8RLkaKFY88ijqybNN+Ww37JKy4h4AVau2TVCifkQ2cmnuDidN3jvOkN7nC6XDiwq5ysqd0 oQooWC1g==; |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
19-01-15 00:18 0018 -26 -0.6 396 1 VVV N1BUG 1 19-01-15 05:58 0558 -25 -0.6 395 1 VVV N1BUG 1 19-01-15 06:18 0618 -25 -0.5 395 1 VVV N1BUG 1 19-01-15 00:16 0016 -26 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 00:36 0036 -29 -0.5 395 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 02:16 0216 -30 -0.8 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 04:56 0456 -28 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 05:16 0516 -29 -0.7 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 05:56 0556 -24 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 06:16 0616 -25 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 06:36 0636 -28 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 06:56 0656 -29 -0.6 396 2 VVV N1BUG 2 19-01-15 00:10 0010 -30 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 00:30 0030 -27 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 00:50 0050 -32 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 02:10 0210 -30 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 03:10 0310 -33 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 03:30 0330 -32 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 03:50 0350 -32 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 04:50 0450 -29 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 05:10 0510 -28 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 05:30 0530 -30 -0.8 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 05:50 0550 -31 -0.6 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 06:10 0610 -27 -0.9 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 06:30 0630 -26 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 06:50 0650 -31 -0.7 395 5 VVV N1BUG 5 19-01-15 07:00 0700 -34 -0.8 395 X VVV N1BUG X(New SlowJT9 .exe installed 14 Jan 2018, 'Discard audio frequency limits on RX' box ticked as before. No decodes on JT9-10 overnight. Box unticked circa 0645, then a decode appeared.) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test, Rik Strobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Geoff G0LUJ |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test, Rik Strobbe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [600MRG] JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test - post sunrise, Geoff G0LUJ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |