Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR

To: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR
From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 23:03:51 +0000
Cc: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/70mi0nwiLWuT6MoWmAp0KH7zhhxa2Jy02Kh2qDt5ic=; b=TNAXqYlLvpkblsmLTiGYCmgC0uovfIldEQFXH3Ro+46uDd2wRC7kCpMMoo791bp4mP 7gdXymI+mU3g4qO283RklhQAfn5hkGGaUxzytPqcJByLCntJpy32QOWWmRE3dBQVdBKV A8UFSzHqEX8mpR5SmrjMQ5ILwoBO9P7ZYNy/iGpUuvxezs07PsTJV0c79tMqyuZa5+JM 4bXkyja+ONkdnkUbpUQnx5YBxaYKH6N4ZbNw9UfFZc5ivFKJzhxP9k+5cKAtw6n1Cd3w IWVQsc1d0bz4xaLxDnESKqECYOy5Qlpr9ugMR89McMrTfXBZvoYFTcGE9M58ZSvk726F 2x8w==
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23RMPWcJBhnE0qK+b=sP7kQpPCBO3t8LgKHTij-4xtud-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6WiCbKZmP_hA-gyunrx-NVT=mHyT9Sq6Fgu7fE-yx3QQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA8k23Qb+-82S0WySY4bXY7+bZOnKorHtdG-qOXkafUBs873=Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TnyE0NUGA9XQsmDhOxn81dqNTC3pQh2H7VfEoQHH=mXw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RMPWcJBhnE0qK+b=sP7kQpPCBO3t8LgKHTij-4xtud-g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Hello Andy,

Is  there  any point in Paul putting his dummy load on the end of his
75  odd meters of feeder co-ax outside? And then on the secondary of
his  matching  transformer when tapped one to one? In case the co-ax is
iffy or the impedance matching transfomer's doing something odd?


Sunday, December 24, 2017, 10:42:16 PM, you wrote:

> Well ...    Using exactly the values in the filter circuit diagram,
> 50R transforms through the filter to 48.5 - j2.86 (Ret Loss = 30dB, 
> VSWR = 1.07)   [Using GM3SEK's original Netcalc prog.]


> So that's pretty conclusive the ideal filter values will not be
> upsetting things at the fundamental frequency.    
> According to Google, the  T106-2 has a stated Al value of  13.5nH
> /turn^2  so 72 turns does indeed give 70uH.   So IF your core is correct, the 
> filter should be OK.


> It's a bit difficult from now on, at a distance, to try to work out what is 
> happening.
> Anyone else, any suggestions ?


> BTW ...


> Peak to peak of a { symetrical }square wave needs to be multiplied
> by 4/pi to get the peak-to-peak of the fundamental component.   So
> the amploitude you see will be lower by about 1.3 times for teh same 
> fundamental power component. 


> Andy  G4JNT





-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:[email protected]



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>