Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR
From: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 15:12:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23Qb+-82S0WySY4bXY7+bZOnKorHtdG-qOXkafUBs873=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6WiCbKZmP_hA-gyunrx-NVT=mHyT9Sq6Fgu7fE-yx3QQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA8k23Qb+-82S0WySY4bXY7+bZOnKorHtdG-qOXkafUBs873=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
Hi Andy,

This is very interesting, because 12 watts is what I think I have consistently been able to generate into the antenna before problems creep in.

I can easily accept that this amplifier may only be capable of 12 or 13 watts.

What I don't understand is why I think I am seeing a clean 25 watts into a pure resistive 50 ohm load. Can someone please check my math?

I'm running the output of the amplifier through a low pass filter, then a scopematch, then into a high quality 50 ohm load.

My scopematch circuit is here:

http://n1bug.com/n1debug/LF_ScopeMatch-20171224.jpg

Note that it is configured such that on the current sense output, 1V=1A and for voltage, 1V=50V.

Running into a pure 50 ohm resistive load I am seeing exactly 4 divisions peak to peak on the scope (2 divisions above center, 2 below).

500 mV/div * 4 divs = 2.0V peak-peak or 0.707V RMS.

0.707 * 50 (1V=50V on the scopematch) = 35.4V RMS.

35.4^2 / 50 ohms = 25 watts.

Where am I going wrong?

As a check on scopematch calibration I set my HP 3325B to 10V peak-peak, ran it through the scopematch into the same 50 ohm dummy load at 137.5 kHz. I set the scope to 50 mV/div and it read exactly 4 divisions peak-peak = .2V * 50 = 10V which seems to verify. Admittedly this verification is at a much lower power level.

73,
Paul N1BUG



On 12/24/2017 01:06 PM, Andy Talbot wrote:
The other thing about that circuit that is wrong is the power out specification for the turns ratio / loading resistance.

For a single ended PA, Pout max = Vdd ^2 / 2 / RL.   With a 9:1 (3:1 turns) transformer RL = 50 / 9 = 5.6 ohms So for a 13.8V suply (ignoring Vsaturation) that means  an absolute maximum power output possible of 13.8^  / 2 / 5.6 = 17 Watts into a true 50 ohms load on the transformer output.

In practice the device will saturate with a volt or so across it, lowering the voltage swing and keeping power out to a lower value.  If the peak swing is 12V, Pmax now drops to 12^2/2/5.6 = 13 watts

 Riccardo, I assume you mean 1:4 turns ratio,  or 1:16 impedance transformation.   That Means RL = 50/16 = 3.1 ohms and at 12V swing gives 23 watts out as you state

I made a push-pull PA using a similar  type of FET, but used a 28V supply and 1+1:2 transformer.  It gives 40 - 50 Watts over the frequency range  100kHz to 2MHz

http://www.g4jnt.com/Linear_LF_PA3.pdf

Andy  G4JNT

On 24 December 2017 at 17:33, Riccardo Zoli <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    Hi Paul, Stefan

    my first PA for MF and LF, based on a IRF520, was similar.
    However, I used a most appropriate 1:4 output transformer
    instead a 1:9. With 13.8V, a 50mA bias current is more than
    adequate for AB class. You could obtain about 20-22W max on output.
    Obiviously, more supply voltage it means more power output.

    Merry XMAS & HNY!

    All the best


    73 de Riccardo IW4DXW


    Il 24/Dic/2017 13:30, "DK7FC" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:

        Hi Paul,

        Am 23.12.2017 23 <tel:23.12.2017%2023>:36, schrieb N1BUG:

            For anyone trying to follow along, this is my current
            version:

            http://n1bug.com/ASB_LF_Amp-20171223.jpg
            <http://n1bug.com/ASB_LF_Amp-20171223.jpg>


        The circuit looks good to me now. Maybe it helps to use a
        low pass filter in T configuration instead of a PI config.
        The T config starts with a series L. The PI config starts
        with a parallel C. That could make a significant difference
        for the harmonics.

        73 and Merry christmas, Stefan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>