Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: TXing 2200m WSPR
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 22:55:14 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7CWVvLFeBmf+NhFiquSjjLw4IYYra16DZZ30lMxyyHw=; b=Oja4CRppVCmhm908NTZW3BqocrPBNRM7xcnuizg8YQaCM+fnW89MPlEfl5/TwspYnh ofmAGVJC1hzxfm62Bcuaky3RmcZwS5RYNOtQWh1of47LAPXqEYf6/8F19AY65LNzQykh hf+Z40eTahVnvp4Vjni1C1UE0LPL73de2X+Rf00rvonxk1GJcyaUsMHt9o3t4bhESQAC TCg0fr7tGM2/vZar4pQDOuw2H50SplTwabZlg3bWxJIi9XVo49q2suceLgtDvLk7peQq XR+Vbb19MM50AVrZJuQVw4ejqVzg91gX2AcVx1ejdVZYTggHLE5Mje3+uLF/3LLxVRAv 7FZA==
In-reply-to: <CAA8k23RMPWcJBhnE0qK+b=sP7kQpPCBO3t8LgKHTij-4xtud-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <103A2C60B87B4930A99ED33442E477AF@StevePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CANA3B6WiCbKZmP_hA-gyunrx-NVT=mHyT9Sq6Fgu7fE-yx3QQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA8k23Qb+-82S0WySY4bXY7+bZOnKorHtdG-qOXkafUBs873=Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23TnyE0NUGA9XQsmDhOxn81dqNTC3pQh2H7VfEoQHH=mXw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RMPWcJBhnE0qK+b=sP7kQpPCBO3t8LgKHTij-4xtud-g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Should have said when calculated for 137.0kHz
'jnt

On 24 December 2017 at 22:42, Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote:
...    Using exactly the values in the filter circuit diagram, 50R transforms through the filter to 48.5 - j2.86 (Ret Loss = 30dB,  VSWR = 1.07)   [Using GM3SEK's original Netcalc prog.]

So that's pretty conclusive the ideal filter values will not be upsetting things at the fundamental frequency.    

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>