To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation |
From: | "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:36 -0000 |
In-reply-to: | <098856018E3A46AB96BA9F9FC6C8FFCD@JimPC> |
References: | <74845C11BC3444D79B63A207E428BDE0@lindavideo>, <005701ccf561$cd9d4250$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>, <098856018E3A46AB96BA9F9FC6C8FFCD@JimPC> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
If such a rule built into the permits for this band then this amateur for one will never consider using it. 73 Dave G3YMC On 28 Feb 2012 at 0:02, James Moritz wrote: > So there is > a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse code at all in this > frequency range. It would be better to use totally different types of > transmission that would not be confused with a NDB beacon signal. > http://www.davesergeant.com |
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Who is it?, Roman RW3ADB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Re: Fw: Re: Fwd: 137K transceiver ready for qso!!, Reeves Paul |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, Andy Talbot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |