Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:48:41 -0000
References: <74845C11BC3444D79B63A207E428BDE0@lindavideo><005701ccf561$cd9d4250$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><098856018E3A46AB96BA9F9FC6C8FFCD@JimPC><[email protected]> <CAA8k23TU1321FRDyvbdVMKY+pGdrchiAhPpZ43cZPTon-kOmyw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Andy
This statement sounds like a self confessed Appliance Operator Amateur you could at least try CW for a while. Intensely dislike seems strong. I even tried Opera and do not dislike it or any Data mode but I prefer CW where the skill of the operator is evident when communicating instead of pressing GREEN for tx and RED for stop and AMBER for wait incase of a DECODE as in Appliance Operator.
I would encourage you to get a morse key and have a Go, one has to be positive !!
g3kev
 
  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

That''s OK Dave, if Mal's opinion won the day, then this amateur would never use the band.  I will not use Morse.  I intensely dislike it   So one way or the other one of us would populate the frequency. 
 
However, more than likely commone sense will prevail, as it always seems to in the Am bands and operating in this country,
 
'jnt


 
On 28 February 2012 06:50, Dave Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote:
If such a rule built into the permits for this band then this amateur
for one will never consider using it.

73 Dave G3YMC

On 28 Feb 2012 at 0:02, James Moritz wrote:

> So there is
> a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse code at all in this
> frequency range. It would be better to use totally different types of
> transmission that would not be confused with a NDB beacon signal.
>


http://www.davesergeant.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>