Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

from [M0FMT] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:22:37 +0000 (GMT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1330356157; bh=o8Mk+TFUmqgSAgYMgYdXpcHvbNNXLJk53PWRyRQmkq0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WGb/PydF0QDJrRySlW/rjvKo0DWrBrhuJ74xYDjxAABsHzsGHLDNc7tHSPMgpDIrZJLr1rJgKJyensa2NYPMPJr3Xya9RPQvjKNW9UjUbq+YWV1aNEQijckLcIKMTaVNy0SdUWqY2qHgR8KCUBzG+n7/YEp+hu/Dkho9aeTuB6A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b+B5kV8i0xxnHE/yUB/gm3q74HqcXqVQ/wzO/7Jhyu54W3eYae/7mMg4CiG5VnY0w3W1Q+VXgBHTdvIiO5bmDXI/cWQhHqC0281afnSBglugMWYdoqmXLHWI8JUNMjLKsw5GBF3CJj+zn4zUvoLkceGu83mDz28g3dRXN1Fuvz4=;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <005701ccf561$cd9d4250$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <74845C11BC3444D79B63A207E428BDE0@lindavideo> <C4EE404465AB4B2C89B9809DE06DD805@oem92799c6e374> <1205576556-1330352309-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-124445598-@b27.c11.bise7.blackberry> <005701ccf561$cd9d4250$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

 
Now you are talking Mal   ...... :-) Propose it!


73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: mal hamilton <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 15:09
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

The band should be licensed for CW operators only so that they could recognize and read the CW  beacons and AVOID them.
Has OFCOM thought of this.  Neither should there be any amateur unattended BEACONS to jam the Primary user Beacons even unintentionally.
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

Hi all. Following on from Tracey's info what would be the various regulators reaction be if we were crowded out of this band as we only have on a secondary basis. 73. Ken. M00KHW
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
From: "Tracey Gardner" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:50:43 -0000
Subject: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

Hello Ken
 
I doubt it, but you never know.
I've just checked our Received In Europe (REU) database and there are some 29 inactive NDBs listed in the 472-479kHz range.
If they were all to become active that would roughly double the number of NDBs in that segment.
 
 
73s Tracey G5VU
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:06 AM
Subject: LF: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

Dear all LFs
 
With the WRC-12 new LF band allocation is it possible that any dormant NDBs there will be resurrected to justify their slot in the band?
 
73s
 
Ken
 
M0KHW


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, M0FMT
Next by Date:  Re: LF: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, ken . h . wright
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]