Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

from [ken . h . wright] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:20:12 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1330352313; bh=s6j8RkzIquoRXF1PneDM1ueJWxlNN17lcp94+Cxddsw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=cKUuuvwZk9ZWC6u00qPL+ThVPFgVmjgFbITQPAhCxofaQD+JDrm4JsOAr57Dir4NFiZhcXqGsItERc2LbzE12pHuFbApmwGBJy0fxWbZePaJghTMaxP1XI+OHjgzayexsSgdCKxb3HYA1168US3QnUK6fVkkXewLu2PSFzlhdDw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Message-ID:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=yNHISzSyB0fpg6HWti4yAsEyMXV7ZC17fx7EkVL48HnCI71ox0qSdPjSutNhh6Yi3hvKhRAo1z9KRSIqzdftzKZp9qqV1sPXfqeaLcL0o5825dq9mcZm8c8DoMHZVcudCzZWZeuhZZCuRowov1ta04tOgda/fN9b3K8dL57kQD8= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <C4EE404465AB4B2C89B9809DE06DD805@oem92799c6e374>
References: <74845C11BC3444D79B63A207E428BDE0@lindavideo> <C4EE404465AB4B2C89B9809DE06DD805@oem92799c6e374>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Sensitivity: Normal
Hi all. Following on from Tracey's info what would be the various regulators reaction be if we were crowded out of this band as we only have on a secondary basis. 73. Ken. M00KHW
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
From: "Tracey Gardner" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:50:43 -0000
Subject: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

Hello Ken
 
I doubt it, but you never know.
I've just checked our Received In Europe (REU) database and there are some 29 inactive NDBs listed in the 472-479kHz range.
If they were all to become active that would roughly double the number of NDBs in that segment.
 
 
73s Tracey G5VU
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:06 AM
Subject: LF: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation

Dear all LFs

 

With the WRC-12 new LF band allocation is it possible that any dormant NDBs there will be resurrected to justify their slot in the band?

 

73s

 

Ken

 

M0KHW

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, Tracey Gardner
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, Tracey Gardner
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]