You'll have to downscale your antennas then Mal! :-)
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-----Original Message-----
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:33:39
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
Ken
It could be tight at times especially for those with a good RX/Antenna
therefore the ability to hear a good many NDB'S and try to squeeze into a
vacant slot. Another problem for those with Ferrite rod and uProbe RX
antennas they will not hear a lot of these Beacons and therefore could well
be transmitting on top of them.
This was an unusual slot to pick for radio amateur use.
de mal/g3kev
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: LF: RE: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
> Dear Jim, Mal, LF Group.
> All I was trying to say in my message was 'if we could hear say 10 or 12
> NDBs in the UK, would there be sufficient bandwidth left between each NDB
> for us to safely operate using whatever modes we are assigned' Sorry if I
> caused any confussion.
>
> 73s
>
> Ken
>
> M0KHW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Moritz
> Sent: 28 February 2012 00:03
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
>
> Dear Mal, Ken, LF Group,
>
> G3KEV wrote:
> >The band should be licensed for CW operators only so that they could
> >recognize and read the CW beacons and AVOID >them.
>
> One does not need to be a morse code expert to realise there is a strong
> signal repeating the same dots and dashes 24 hours a day on a particular
> frequency. One just needs a little common sense...
>
> >Has OFCOM thought of this. Neither should there be any amateur
unattended
> >BEACONS to jam the Primary user >Beacons even unintentionally.
>
> Whether the transmission is a "manual" QSO or automated, or if an NoV for
an
>
> unattended beacon was being applied for, the important thing for the
amateur
>
> is to be aware of nearby NDBs and avoid transmitting on their
frequencies -
> this is a matter of observation and advance planning, not operating. If
a
> couple of amateurs are yakking away about the WX on a NDB frequency, in CW
> or any other mode, there is no way that the NDB will be able to break in
at
> the end of one over and say "excuse me chaps, but there are aircraft
trying
> to get a bearing on this frequency; would you mind QSYing - thank you so
> much" ;-)
>
> Think about this from the Primary User's point of view - if someone
> navigating an aircraft sets their ADF receiver to a particular beacon
> frequency and hears an assortment of amateur-generated morse code mixed up
> with the beacon ID, this is likely to cause confusion or error. So there
is
> a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse code at all in this
> frequency range. It would be better to use totally different types of
> transmission that would not be confused with a NDB beacon signal.
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>
>
>
>
|
