Re: LF: Re: 2200m Trans-Atlantic QSO dream...

[DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>]

Am 21.03.2018 21:34, schrieb N1BUG:
> I need a better receive antenna for Europe,
me too :-)
>   but I can only build one
> this year (it also has to be low cost). I have to make some decision
> about what it should be.
>    
If you have enough space, try to build such a cardioid antenna.
BTW what i wanted to say, your recent images show a very good mechanical 
work, precise built arrangements and QRO oriented, very well!
You won't expect how rare this is, a good mechanical work in combination 
with beeing active afterwards, not just for a few tests, but regularly.
> When I have high static it usually causes some smearing of the
> signal on the spectrogram. I didn't see any of that on Jay's
> capture. It could be just some problem that is created by my
> receiver. I will have to investigate it.
>    
Which software do you use for capturing QRSS-60 on LF?
SpecLab has an internal noise blanker that can be configured to remove 
as much QRN as possible but leaving as much wanted signal as possible. 
Not like these HF-TRX noise blankers ('high, mid, low').
> I will stay with DFCW60 tonight, but might change to 90 in next
> night(s).
>    
RR, GL.
73, Stefan