To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 16 May 2016 05:38:46 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <279E0DEFDAFA4C849152DBBA3BFEDE8C@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Stefan wrote: > would you think that going from 100s to 200s will improve > things by about 3 dB? Yes, or better: keeping to 100s and going to a 16K mode instead of 8K for an increase of coding gain. > How long do you record the VLF soundcard stream? About 65 months at the moment. > Would it be possible, for example, to transmit a 1 week long > message, without an announcement before the start? Yes, in principle. The longer the message the more chance of a battery problem or sheep knocking down one of the antennas, or thunderstorm or power cut, or one of the cats sleeping on top of the GPS antenna. But with a long message, an interruption of a few hours is not a disaster. After a power cut, my rx will restart with the same reference phase and continue recording so there will be a gap but no loss of phase. We may have to put this to use when we reach ULF. Un-announced is ok because of the continuous recording but better to announce if possible so that I know not to do maintenance (or tests with kites! Will be playing with the Power Sled 24). -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, DK1IS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |