Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

from [Paul Nicholson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:23:53 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <279E0DEFDAFA4C849152DBBA3BFEDE8C@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 
Reconstructed carrier of the successful 2016-05-14_21:40:02
message

 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160515a.gif

S/N is 19.15 dB.

The unsuccessful message 2016-05-13_00:00:02

 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160515b.gif

S/N is 11.67 dB.

Noise was 4.63 dB higher and the signal 2.86 dB weaker.

About 3dB too weak to decode.

Looking forward to the 19 char decode. With these signal
and noise variations, there's an element of luck involved!

--
Paul Nicholson
--
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF? Done!, Rik Strobbe
Next by Date:  LF: qrv 472.5, Dr. Wolf Ostwald
Previous by Thread:  Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC
Next by Thread:  Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]