To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 8 May 2016 19:18:56 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <279E0DEFDAFA4C849152DBBA3BFEDE8C@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
> There was another carrier from 09:45...19:45 UTC today [7th] > on 6470 Hz. Thanks, that was useful against the low daytime noise. I'm having fun with the H field rx, it's not working so well at 6.47 compared with 8.27. E field is doing well. At 8.27 usually H has the better S/N but not so at 6.47 I think because of the hum harmonics reducing the blanker effectiveness. The above carrier helps with diagnostics. > Start time: 07.05.2016 20:00:02 UTC > Period: 100s > Length: 19 > CRC 16 > Coding 8K19A A problem with the E-field rx here may disrupt that. Battery went flat today while I was out. Lost about 3 hours. No a disaster, EbNaut can still recover the message if the rest is received well enough. It was a very noisy night last night and geomagnetic disturbance this morning. Maybe today and tonight will make up for that. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | LF: May 7-8 Best QRB/reports, Alex R7NT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF, Tobias DG3LV |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |