Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:24:40 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1462519486; bh=mmqTJzcL4iyCtlf76jJKF2x637gPygOjqZBhpP90EF0=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jdXDErJAOTCiB72hfT3ndU78niCnRUpbiRsaczyILGtOV5w69zxX7KSiWI2MXNnYH vLvxCX9nJAyUESdPc7Z01F5qyLGt1HK8Tnc1RTAsofdbL4dvsKUS76G+/DpyTL6Iy9 tvEY0Jzq2XZMN7A4wtfAkpIU7iqIjo+XAHpmjv7M=
Importance: Normal
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
No chance to see anything on 6470 Hz here due to heavy railway QRM. I noticed that the unstable lines seem to be concentrated on odd multiples of 16.70 Hz. Going 8 to 10 Hz up (e.g. to 6480 Hz) would place the signal in a QRM minimum, gaining at least 5 dB on average.
 
All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
  

Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 2:24 AM
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz


Stefan,

Your 200mA carrier comes through well here at 6.47 kHz, nice
signal at 0.14 fT during the night.  Daytime is 0.04 fT or
below and might be a bit of a struggle.

I don't need any more carrier.  From the raw recording I can
optimise filters and blankers and look at most of the diurnal.

--
Paul Nicholson
--

Attachment: vlfwide_qrm_6470Hz_150506_0106_3x.png
Description: PNG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>