To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz |
From: | Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 13 May 2016 06:58:14 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <279E0DEFDAFA4C849152DBBA3BFEDE8C@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
> But why is the Eb/N0 so high, Very strange. Only 30.5% symbol errors were counted, which is where the Eb/N0 = +5.1 comes from. But the carrier level: 11.2 dB in 24.0 uHz corresponds to Eb/N0 = -1.1 dB. The laws of physics have changed? Or I have a software bug or made some mistake? Or something strange about the signal? Symbol error map: http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/160512a.gif The night was low noise and daytime signal appears good too. It looks like a really good signal, except that the overall average calculates to only 11.2 dB in 1/41600 seconds. Will investigate after I have finished work. Interesting to see what today's signal does - last night was low noise too. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Roland Bruestle |
Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |