| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz |
| From: | DK7FC <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 May 2016 14:37:23 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <279E0DEFDAFA4C849152DBBA3BFEDE8C@White> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Paul,Hmm, that's a pity. Maybe it would be useful to run a beacon, periodically the same message in shorter symbols, maybe 40s. A single character would be already fine, like 'R'. This would take 3:33:20 to be sent. I could do this each 4 hours. Or i can send a simple carrier for a few days. However i want to build a circuit which keeps the antenna current constant, even during rain, so the ERP stays constant! 73, Stefan Am 14.05.2016 12:59, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Stefan wrote: > f = 6470.00000 Hz > Start time: 13.05.2016 00:00:02 UTC > Symbol length: 100 s > Characters: 6 I haven't been able to decode this one. The average noise was 3.7 dB higher than the previous successful message, so there should still be a couple of dB to spare. I've tried a wider range of phase search in case the day/night phase change was more than expected. So far it seems that 6.47 is more variable and unpredictable than 8.27 which is opposite to what I'd expect. -- Paul Nicholson -- |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF?, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: A transductor instead of a traditional variometer on VLF/LF/MF?, John Bruce McCreath |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, Paul Nicholson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |