Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | VLF: Trying 6.47 kHz again |
| From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 May 2016 09:17:59 -0400 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1463750279; bh=3Dto7DajePYhpOlTI6zLGEnABja56+/kxTkcDqMGKPw=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5kFfWuAwMjFUXWR2ssRFcmcW+0UybK79EI8GiPcy09LwuLaKOffjlhQxBv5F/Sdte lbwOWCFo/2ain1BNRrX8Ut5riM3pNDos7G1wzHa2YmdgzXynDK26zvsU9UFLZ9TmAo WnFipwth7c1pFBlziBzk7gMpe3qg+jINRbvRQwSI= |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Armed with more effective autonotch filter settings and Wolf's latest comb-notch option, I decided to have another go at receiving 6470 Hz. It looks like the railway QRM in the narrowband spectrograms has indeed gone down significantly. Of course with aggressive filtering and blanking there's always a risk to kill desired signal as well, throwing out the baby with the bathwater. As a check, I have added two artificial carriers at -110 dB target level (same as DL3NDR on 8.27 kHz). Stefan, if you like you could perhaps try another long 6.47 kHz carrier tomorrow or Sunday. If I can see it we mihght be able to compare daytime propagation patterns between the two frequency bands. Best 73, Markus http://www.df6nm.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm |
| Previous by Date: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: CQ 472.5 cw, Dr. Wolf Ostwald |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz, DK7FC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: VLF: Trying 6.47 kHz again, VLF.it, DK7FC |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |