Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut transmissions on lower frequencies?, pre-tests: 6.47kHz
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:46:23 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
Hi Paul, VLF,

OK, all right, thanks for the helpful report.

So the current transmission could have even better chances with shorter symbols (80 s) beeing transmitted in the time of ideal SNR. We will see. At least there should be more coding gain now with 10 characters. For a long message of 20 characters i would need more ERP if the transmission should have to fit into this ideal time slot. Impossible with this small coil. So the symbol length must be longer. That means the average SNR drops below the necessary limit as we saw now. That means, if the phase is not a big problem, it must be even more longer :-) My recent 20 char (which was 18 char actually) message was placed into a night-day-night time slot. So day-night-day would have been better. "Day" starts at 4 UTC and holds until 18 UTC these days maybe. So i could try that again. If that won't work i should try 200s symbols or the other coding you suggested.

73, Stefan

Am 20.05.2016 07:28, schrieb Paul Nicholson:

Measurement of reconstructed carrier from the 31.5 hour message,
In approximately 8 hour blocks (34.7uHz):

 From       To         Signal    S/N      Phase  Noise
 16th 21:00 17th 05:00 0.077 fT  11.0 dB  112.7  0.022  fT
 17th 05:00 17th 13:00 0.063 fT  17.4 dB   75.2  0.0085 fT
 17th 13:00 17th 21:00 0.041 fT   9.2 dB   83.5  0.0143 fT
 17th 21:00 18th 04:30 0.05  fT   3.8 dB  125.0  0.032  fT

Day/night phase shift up to 50 degrees which is about what was
expected, although this is a long average so it could be varying
more on shorter timescales to make the signal apparently weaker.

The 18th from 00:00 onwards was noisy.

Overall, would have needed to average about 14dB in this
bandwidth (34.7 uHz) to have a reasonable chance (~50%)
of decode.

Daytime is doing better than nighttime. In 17.36 uHz we have

 17th 04:00 to 20:00 0.057 fT  18.2 dB

 (eg 11 chars, 72 seconds, Eb/N0 = +0.23 dB)

Or, in 34.7 uHz

 17th 05:00 to 13:00 0.063 fT  17.4 dB

 (eg 9 chars, 40 seconds, Eb/N0 = +0.2 dB)

Conclusion is that it's not the phase that's blocking these
long messages, it's the poor nighttime S/N.

--
Paul Nicholson
--


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>