Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: RE: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: slow WSPR? |
| From: | Sabine Cremer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:25:41 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22D26@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 |
Hi Rik, as mentioned in the report the test were done off-air, by addingequal amounts of pure white noise to WSPR / Opera signals of identicalamplitude. So no QRM/QRN or QSB involved. Maybe I will do these tests over with QRN and/or QSB added (if there is some interest and if time permits). I would be very interested in the results! Don't get me wrong, I don't want to know what the *best software* is, I would like to learn what are the differences using the various algorithms and WHY this is so! It is obviously, that you are the right person to give these answers. ;-) 73 Sabine, DL1DBC |
| Previous by Date: | LF: slow WSPR?, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Fwd: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR?, Graham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: slow WSPR?, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |