Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: CMSK

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: CMSK
From: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 09:16:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <66C690FA65054015B54D3DC3A6699556@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Stephan,

Jay and I were disappointed with it. The decoding was not very robust with 
noise and fading. I will look for notes at home - don't remember the details. 

John, W1TAG



On Sep 13, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Stefan Schäfer 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> OK...
> Edgar from Tasmania passed me to this webpage 
> http://www.qsl.net/zl1bpu/CMSK/cmsk.htm showing the CMSK mode. Probably well 
> knows by the old experts :-)
> 
> So what about that mode for very weak signal modes on LF? Pros and Cons?
> Is this woth to try above 10000 km distance?
> 
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
> 
> Am 12.09.2012 20:43, schrieb pws:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Question: why do all those professional services for submarines
>> down at LF/VLF use MSK and not any kind of that advanced stuff
>> you are talking about?
>> 
>> As far as I know they are using non-linear transmitters like my
>> cellphone does.
>> 
>> Peter, df3lp
>> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>