Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR? |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:48:28 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <5FC68B43E618457593E547DB7833EA8B@AGB> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22D26@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB23EED@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <5FC68B43E618457593E547DB7833EA8B@AGB> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
I think it's better to test the real path out there. That's why we built up our equipment, or not? 73, Stefan Am 12.09.2012 16:21, schrieb Graham: Try the tests using the Path-sim propagation software , that's a good universal test instrument, free to downloadG.. http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/files/pathsimtech100.pdf |
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: slow WSPR?, Rik Strobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Fw: LOST TRACK, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR?, Graham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR?, Graham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |