Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR? |
| From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:03:15 +0100 |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22D26@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB23EED@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <5FC68B43E618457593E547DB7833EA8B@AGB> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Yes that's true , but for HF , then Doppler and delay need to be tested or the mode will not survive transit and 500 has phase distortion in qsb , could be seen using Murrays psk propagation time delay measuring software seemed to explain why psk31 did not work very well at range (or over the pole on hf ?) G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:48 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR? I think it's better to test the real path out there. That's why we built up our equipment, or not?73, Stefan Am 12.09.2012 16:21, schrieb Graham:Try the tests using the Path-sim propagation software , that's a good universal test instrument, free to downloadG.. http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/files/pathsimtech100.pdf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: UA0SNV, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: MF tonite, C. Groeger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: slow WSPR?, Stefan Schäfer |
| Next by Thread: | LF: RE: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: slow WSPR?, Sabine Cremer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |