Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: slow WSPR? |
| From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:45:09 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> |
| References: | <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22D26@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Rik, Am 12.09.2012 14:05, schrieb Rik Strobbe: Hello Sabine, as mentioned in the report the test were done off-air, by adding equal amounts of pure white noise to WSPR / Opera signals of identical amplitude. So no QRM/QRN or QSB involved. Maybe I will do these tests over with QRN and/or QSB added (if there is some interest and if time permits). Yes, there is some interest!It would be possible to run an audio file in SpecLab, presenting typical LF-evening noise, maybe plus some DCF/HGA sidebands and carrier! I think it is possible that there will be a difference, resulting in pro-Opera. At least yesterday it seemed to me that OP32 cannot be as bad as often mentioned. 73, Stefan/DK7FC |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Fwd: Re: Ideas for a slower WSPR for the 137 khz band, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: RE: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: slow WSPR?, Sabine Cremer |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: slow WSPR?, Rik Strobbe |
| Next by Thread: | LF: RE: slow WSPR?, Rik Strobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |