Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: slow WSPR?

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: slow WSPR?
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:45:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <[email protected]>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22D26@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<[email protected]> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB22E5E@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hi Rik,

Am 12.09.2012 14:05, schrieb Rik Strobbe:
Hello Sabine,

as mentioned in the report the test were done off-air, by adding equal amounts 
of pure white noise to WSPR / Opera signals of identical amplitude.
So no QRM/QRN or QSB involved. Maybe I will do these tests over with QRN and/or 
QSB added (if there is some interest and if time permits).
Yes, there is some interest!
It would be possible to run an audio file in SpecLab, presenting typical LF-evening noise, maybe plus some DCF/HGA sidebands and carrier! I think it is possible that there will be a difference, resulting in pro-Opera. At least yesterday it seemed to me that OP32 cannot be as bad as often mentioned.

73, Stefan/DK7FC




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>