Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep
From: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:51:28 +0100
In-reply-to: <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB>
References: <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1

Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving mails from two sources personally.

Eddie

On 04/06/2012 08:40, Graham wrote:
Yes  'Flash' traffic  only  on the  ref

G.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Clive Lorton" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep

Gentlemen,

I’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and files section of Yahoo.

Just my two pence worth……..

Clive g8poc




-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5043 - Release Date: 06/03/12





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>