Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep

from [Chris] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:05:33 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338797128; bh=8pXhGJnxetNXUkt9QUpmQzilGsg90LSvKQ8N69OFfXE=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=15/Dnugti5qZXA7bCSyT96H5GKQ7mN8bQjt90YyYdy9qLRvbDF0PkczHZuchOjDEpqR4lIK9VPVKkGpnU6IDSSxi6UXitjF9fEErq+K6WpqKkhkXmYimnMk0BRr+tyEBU8UIKsml6JaHo9O4qXMi5Jg2i6q6shQB6xZwkDtaES8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=CH3RwnSxSHCmEjK1fetDW/sxuk9+d6pMLeOFHaytCjIhfcVpCElrrHi0DGfnrd7SfCT6xO+Oenyf5P/Gl9LgJ3I4H6/QzRX6qK8wKP7M1YO6QgPLYfTsVY7EaJgTcxyI1vy/NHguI+l0heKOfBLPYOeyiuKQFXrcrF3dIqiZZ0c= ;
References: <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Yes, I agree too. It's the best piece of common sense there's been for a while about this. Well done Clive! 
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]> 
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep
Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving mails from two sources personally. 

Eddie

On 04/06/2012 08:40, Graham wrote:

Yes  'Flash' traffic  only  on the  ref

G.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Clive Lorton" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep


Gentlemen,
I’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and files section of Yahoo. 

Just my two pence worth……..

Clive g8poc





-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5043 - Release Date: 06/03/12
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, mal hamilton
Next by Date:  Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, John Gibbs
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, g3zjo
Next by Thread:  RE: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Ken
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]