Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep

To: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep
From: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:43:55 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Z-usanet-msgid: XID772qFcur79616X23
On 6/3/2012 7:30 PM, pws wrote:
I'm running Beagle on Gnome for indexing and search for any kind of
information stored locally.

Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable"
or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the
future.

There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement
driven open systems. You always have to keep in mind:
"don't post when coming from pub."

So, please tell me what is "outdated" here?
What is outdated is the fact that to use your technique of finding relevant contents,
one would be forced to store everything locally.... then of course any decent tool
like Google Desktop can index and find what one is interested in.

IMHO, it is much more intelligent and rationale to have a central repository, where
everything is archived, instead of duplicating on each user PC all the past messages of
the group.

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>