Gentlemen.
I think it a very good idea to have a technical/qso split, this is why I
voted to keep both. I would also be very useful if possible to be able to
contact members direct through either site on technical issues. I have sent
this message via both sites for those who have not migrated 

73
Ken  M0KHW

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: 04 June 2012 09:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep

Yes, I agree too. It's the best piece of common sense there's been for a 
while about this. Well done Clive!
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep


> Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving

> mails from two sources personally.
>
> Eddie
>
> On 04/06/2012 08:40, Graham wrote:
>> Yes  'Flash' traffic  only  on the  ref
>>
>> G.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Clive Lorton" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM
>> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep
>>
>>> Gentlemen,
>>>
>>> I'm beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. 
>>> Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo 
>>> for technical discussion.  That way daily QSO information will not be 
>>> archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the 
>>> search function and files section of Yahoo.
>>>
>>> Just my two pence worth....
>>>
>>> Clive g8poc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5043 - Release Date: 06/03/12
>>
>>
>
>