Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep |
| From: | "Ken" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:11:46 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1338801106; bh=xLUDx2ZEDDrXFvGyfLVaaTidNNW/RFos8Xw1Lz3ffIE=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=fJ7VhZiItzFZ9FLQSG75uDZTvXCXQoO7OFVNz9yhefGV0+hV//JcEuhfJz664Q3LnLdUzxlFNt09TF3OR4oxnn3Ur+fMlk3zV5vxgVUxUmMpbjRyQN821DMDlNhLqDpWZ8mNvkEPzB7H+Wkp4y1Y6wadrXgcruRVpd/oNCus2zE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index; b=pCzE9qRHJywuWEndhPbO0CVQ8XJGCk8QVDjzzP069E1t6y9dXzrJZcWN3AkJoaJNQY0bXXQYuXGnl8ll9qZ5gCFzg9t3ZKdfcTMlRgf7n300CSLnZBZ4UhPB9Tku1Stj9MZnv/AaAKw7uBHuq+OVTk8ZNvSj2tsyeJRgEdw2uLA= ; |
| In-reply-to: | <0810E17DF6EF45429E4EB7D3CF23B190@IBM7FFA209F07C> |
| References: | <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB> <[email protected]> <0810E17DF6EF45429E4EB7D3CF23B190@IBM7FFA209F07C> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| Thread-index: | Ac1CKPICLoC10g31RBSE64amgY10XgACPhrA |
Gentlemen. I think it a very good idea to have a technical/qso split, this is why I voted to keep both. I would also be very useful if possible to be able to contact members direct through either site on technical issues. I have sent this message via both sites for those who have not migrated 73 Ken M0KHW -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: 04 June 2012 09:06 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Yes, I agree too. It's the best piece of common sense there's been for a while about this. Well done Clive! Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:51 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep > Yes its a good compromise and I never feel pain or distress when receiving > mails from two sources personally. > > Eddie > > On 04/06/2012 08:40, Graham wrote: >> Yes 'Flash' traffic only on the ref >> >> G. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Clive Lorton" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM >> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep >> >>> Gentlemen, >>> >>> I'm beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. >>> Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo >>> for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be >>> archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the >>> search function and files section of Yahoo. >>> >>> Just my two pence worth.... >>> >>> Clive g8poc >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2425/5043 - Release Date: 06/03/12 >> >> > > |
| Previous by Date: | LF: 500 now, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Clive Lorton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Chris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |