To: | [email protected], [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep |
From: | Clive Lorton <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:04:48 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Gentlemen, I’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and files section of Yahoo. Just my two pence worth…….. Clive g8poc |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: O.T.: Reflector status, Dimitrios Tsifakis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Alberto di Bene |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |