To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:50:25 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAA8k23RbV8iTukrJUkgO07v+AAMF=PiewOzyFBJiKOqoVB=AnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D015BEAA80DA43E1B44982E5AB7C5E39@MaynePC> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Hi Clive, LF,For those who simply subscribed to the list but without having a yahoo account it is not possible to vote! This situation is advantaging the pro-yahoo party. Please remind those who are blind for such facts that there are further members (outside the poll) who want to codeterminate in this process. My vote is pro blacksheep and i would agree with the 2 group compromise. As long as the two groups are not treated like competitors, where one has to win and the other will be shut down after some time. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.06.2012 13:15, schrieb Clive Lorton: If you have voted it is possible to change your vote before the voting period ends. |
Previous by Date: | LF: 2 groups, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep, Daniele Tincani |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep, Clive Lorton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Black Sheep, Daniele Tincani |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |